New Trump Deportation Rules Allow Far More Expulsions
By MICHAEL D. SHEAR and RON NIXON
FEB. 21, 2017 - The New York Times
WASHINGTON
— President Trump has directed his administration to enforce the nationfs
immigration laws more aggressively, unleashing the full force of the federal
government to find, arrest and deport those in the country illegally, regardless
of whether they have committed serious crimes.
Documents
released on Tuesday by the Department
of Homeland Security revealed the broad scope of the presidentfs ambitions:
to publicize crimes by undocumented immigrants; strip such immigrants of privacy
protections; enlist local police officers as enforcers; erect new detention
facilities; discourage asylum seekers; and, ultimately, speed up
deportations.
The
new enforcement policies put into practice language that Mr. Trump used on the
campaign trail, vastly expanding the definition of gcriminal aliensh and warning
that such unauthorized immigrants groutinely victimize Americans,h disregard the
grule of law and pose a threath to people in communities across the United
States.
Despite those assertions in the new documents, research
shows lower levels of crime among immigrants than among native-born
Americans.
The presidentfs new immigration
policies are likely to be welcomed by some law enforcement officials around the
country, who have called for a tougher crackdown on unauthorized immigrants, and
by some Republicans in Congress who have argued that lax enforcement encourages
a never-ending flow of unauthorized immigrants.
But taken together, the new
policies are a rejection of the sometimes more restrained efforts by former
Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush and their predecessors, who sought to
balance protecting the nationfs borders with fiscal, logistical and humanitarian
limits on the exercise of laws passed by Congress.
gThe faithful execution of our immigration laws is best
achieved by using all these statutory authorities to the greatest extent
practicable,h John F. Kelly, the secretary of homeland security, wrote in one of
two memorandums released on Tuesday. gAccordingly, department personnel shall
make full use of these authorities.h
The immediate impact of that shift is not yet fully known.
Advocates for immigrants warned on Tuesday that the new border control and
enforcement directives would create an atmosphere of fear that was likely to
drive those in the country illegally deeper into the shadows.
Administration officials said some of the new policies —
like one seeking to send unauthorized border crossers from Central America to
Mexico while they await deportation hearings — could take months to put in
effect and might be limited in scope.
For now, so-called Dreamers, who were brought to the
United States as young children, will not be targeted unless they commit crimes,
officials said on Tuesday.
Mr. Trump has not yet said where he will get the billions
of dollars needed to pay for thousands of new border control agents, a network
of detention facilities to detain unauthorized immigrants and a wall along the
entire southern border with Mexico.
But politically, Mr. Kellyfs actions on Tuesday serve to
reinforce the presidentfs standing among a core constituency — those who blame
unauthorized immigrants for taking jobs away from citizens, committing heinous
crimes and being a financial burden on federal, state and local governments.
And because of the changes, millions of immigrants in the
country illegally now face a far greater likelihood of being discovered,
arrested and eventually deported.
gThe message is: The immigration
law is back in business,h said Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the
Center for Immigration Studies, which supports restricted immigration. gThat
violating immigration law is no longer a secondary offense.h
Lawyers and advocates for immigrants said the new policies
could still be challenged in court. Maricopa County in Arizona spent years
defending its sheriff at the time, Joseph Arpaio, in federal court, where he was
found to have discriminated against Latinos.
And courts in Illinois, Oregon, Pennsylvania and several
other states have rejected the power given to local and state law enforcement
officers to hold immigrants for up to 48 hours beyond their scheduled release
from detention at the request of federal authorities under a program known as
Secure Communities, which Mr. Trump is reviving.
gWhen you tell state and local police that their job is to
do immigration enforcement,h said Omar
Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Unionfs Immigrantsf Rights
Project, git translates into the unwarranted and illegal targeting of people
because of their race, because of their language, because of the color of their
skin.h
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, said on
Tuesday that the president wanted to gtake the shackles offh of the nationfs
immigration enforcers. He insisted that the new policies made it clear that gthe
No. 1 priority is that people who pose a threat to our country are immediately
dealt with.h
In fact, that was already the policy under the Obama
administration, which instructed agents that undocumented immigrants convicted
of serious crimes were the priority for deportation. Now, enforcement officials
have been directed to seek the deportation of anyone in the country
illegally.
gUnder this executive order, ICE will not exempt classes
or categories of removal aliens from potential enforcement,h a fact sheet
released by the Department of Homeland Security said, using the acronym for Immigration
and Customs Enforcement. gAll of those present in violation of the
immigration laws may be subject to immigration arrest, detention, and, if found
removable by final order, removal from the United States.h
That includes people convicted of fraud in any official
matter before a governmental agency and people who ghave abused any program
related to receipt of public benefits.h
The policy also expands a program
that lets officials bypass due process protections such as court hearings in
some deportation cases.
Under the Obama administration, the program, known as
gexpedited removal,h was used only when an immigrant was arrested within 100
miles of the border and had been in the country no more than 14 days. Now it
will include all those who have been in the country for up to two years, no
matter where they are caught.
gThe administration seems to be putting its foot down as
far as the gas pedal will go,h said Heidi
Altman, policy director for the National Immigrant Justice Center, a
Chicago-based group that offers legal services to immigrants.
In the documents released on Tuesday, the Department of
Homeland Security is directed to begin the process of hiring 10,000 immigration
and customs agents, expanding the number of detention facilities and creating an
office within Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help families of those
killed by undocumented immigrants.
The directives would also revive a program that recruits
local police officers and sherifffs deputies to help with deportation,
effectively making them de facto immigration agents. The effort, called the 287(g) program, was scaled back
during the Obama administration.
The program faces resistance from many states and dozens
of so-called sanctuary
cities, which have refused to allow their law enforcement workers to help
round up undocumented individuals. In New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio in a
statement on Tuesday pledged the cityfs cooperation in cases involving gproven
public safety threats,h but vowed that gwhat we will not do is turn our N.Y.P.D.
officers into immigration agents.h
Under the new directives, the agency would no longer
provide privacy protections to people who are not American citizens or green
card holders. A
policy established in the last days of the Bush administration in January
2009 provided some legal protection for information collected by the Department
of Homeland Security on nonresidents.
The new policies also target unauthorized immigrants who
smuggle their children into the country, as happened with Central American
children seeking to reunite with parents living in the United States. Under the
new directives, such parents could face deportation or prosecution for smuggling
or human trafficking.
Officials said that returning Central American refugees to
Mexico to await hearings would be done only in a limited fashion, and only after
discussions with the government of Mexico.
Mexican officials said on Tuesday
that such a move could violate Mexican law and international accords governing
repatriation, and immigrantsf advocates questioned Mexicofs ability to absorb
thousands of Central Americans in detention centers and shelters.
Reporting was contributed by Liz Robbins, Vivian Yee and Caitlin Dickerson
from New York; Kirk Semple from Mexico City; Fernanda Santos from Phoenix; and
Linda Qiu from Washington.